THEE - The Competition Commission - Commission ref12 Aug 2010
JSE
THEE                                                                            
THEE - The Competition Commission - Commission refers and settles collusion case
in the polymers market                                                          
Media Release                                                                   
12 August 2010                                                                  
Commission refers and settles collusion case in the polymers market             
The Competition Commission today referred complaints of collusion and excessive 
pricing in the polymers market against Sasol Chemical Industries Limited        
("Sasol") and Safripol (Pty) Ltd to the Tribunal for adjudication.              
Simultaneously, it also reached a settlement with Safripol in which it admits   
that the supply agreement between Sasol and Safripol and its implementation     
amounted to price fixing in contravention of the Act. Safripol agreed to pay a  
penalty of R16, 5 million which represents 1, 5% of its total annual turnover   
derived from polypropylene products.                                            
The Commission initiated the investigation in 2007 following concerns raised by 
the Department of Trade and Industry (dti) about polymer pricing and its        
negative effect on diversified growth and employment in manufacturing.          
The Commission found that Sasol had charged excessive prices for polypropylene  
and propylene to its local customers in line with import parity pricing.        
Further, that Sasol and Safripol engaged in collusive conduct as a result of the
implementation of the supply agreement including the operation of the pricing   
formula and the exchange of information relating to the pricing of              
polypropylene.                                                                  
Sasol is the dominant supplier of propylene, for its own use and that of        
Safripol. It is also the major supplier of polypropylene to the South African   
market along with Safripol. The Commission found that South Africa is also a    
major exporter of polypropylene reflecting its competitive position in this     
product. One would therefore have expected pricing to local customers to be on  
the same basis as export prices, however, this is not the case.                 
Polypropylene, a plastics polymer is used by plastics converters to manufacture 
a wide range of products. The competitiveness of local manufacturers in these   
relatively labour intensive activities depends on competitively priced          
polypropylene input.                                                            
"This is an important case as it goes to the heart of government`s objective to 
support employment creation and growth in downstream manufacturing," said       
Commissioner Shan Ramburuth.                                                    
The Commission is seeking a penalty of 10% of Sasol`s annual turnover for each  
of these contraventions.                                                        
ENDS                                                                            
Further Info:                                                                   
Oupa Bodibe, Manager: Advocacy & Stakeholder Relations                          
012 394 3267/ 082 563 6970/ oupab@compcom.co.za                                 
Molebogeng Taunyane, Coordinator: External Communications                       
012 394 3289/ 082 646 8663/ molebogengt@compcom.co.za                           
Date: 12/08/2010 11:33:02 Produced by the JSE SENS Department.                  
The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the    
JSE Limited (`JSE`). The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or            
implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or   
completeness of the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers,     
employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct,     
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature,     
howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,          
information disseminated through SENS.